| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Burlington Northern R. Co. v. Woods ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Woods
''Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Woods'', , was a United States Supreme Court case that applied the precedent of ''Hanna v. Plumer'' to a conflict between state and federal procedural rules for a federal court sitting in diversity.〔Yeazell, S.C. ''Civil Procedure, Seventh Edition.'' Aspen Publishers, New York, NY: 2008, p. 247〕
== Opinion of the Court ==
The defendant in the original case stayed a damage judgment and went on to lose on appeal. According to an Alabama statute, the defendant would be required to pay a ten percent penalty. Under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 38, the penalty was discretionary. Holding the federal rule to be on point and constitutional, the court applied federal rule and gave no penalty.〔Yeazell, p. 247〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Woods」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|